- Joined
- Jun 18, 2026
- Messages
- 3
- Your ID
- 0000
- Admin's Name
- MoneyMoney
- Date of violation
- Jun 17, 2026
- Time of violation
- 0000
Thanks for the response. Before anything else, I want to name what's happening here plainly: with respect, this is shifting the focus from the conduct being reported onto the person reporting it. The question on the table is the timing of those withdrawals — not how the concern came to light. Two replies came in, and between them the topic quietly moved from "did insiders act on advance knowledge of the wipe" to "who leaked admin info and is this blackmail." Those are not the same question, and the second one doesn't answer the first.
On the withdrawal itself: the defense is "I can do what I want with my balance," "it was my birthday," "we didn't take everything." None of that addresses the actual issue — why the withdrawal landed right before a wipe that supposedly only admins knew about. Being allowed to move your own money was never the question. The timing is.
On the claim that this info "could only have been gathered by an admin" — that doesn't hold against the thread itself. The reply defending the withdrawal says, word for word, "we all knew there was a possibility of things getting locked down when the server switched from Rage to FiveM — that was just common sense." So either it was genuinely admin-only, in which case how certain families knew to pull funds right beforehand is exactly what this report is about — or it was common knowledge, in which case there was nothing leaked for me to have improperly obtained. It can't be both ways.
I'd also note the person defending the clan withdrawal holds an Admin Assistant role, which is exactly why we asked for an impartial transaction-log review rather than an internal say-so.
Now, to be direct: we do have additional evidence. Whether it's needed depends entirely on how this investigation is handled. We already know something here isn't right. If the response continues to be deflection — moving the topic instead of addressing the timing — then we'll have no choice but to let that evidence speak for itself, publicly and on the record. Call it a factcheck, not a threat: we'd much rather this be resolved fairly and internally, but we're not going to let the report be buried by turning it around on us.
A fair, evidence-based review of the transaction logs and timing is all we're asking for.
On the withdrawal itself: the defense is "I can do what I want with my balance," "it was my birthday," "we didn't take everything." None of that addresses the actual issue — why the withdrawal landed right before a wipe that supposedly only admins knew about. Being allowed to move your own money was never the question. The timing is.
On the claim that this info "could only have been gathered by an admin" — that doesn't hold against the thread itself. The reply defending the withdrawal says, word for word, "we all knew there was a possibility of things getting locked down when the server switched from Rage to FiveM — that was just common sense." So either it was genuinely admin-only, in which case how certain families knew to pull funds right beforehand is exactly what this report is about — or it was common knowledge, in which case there was nothing leaked for me to have improperly obtained. It can't be both ways.
I'd also note the person defending the clan withdrawal holds an Admin Assistant role, which is exactly why we asked for an impartial transaction-log review rather than an internal say-so.
Now, to be direct: we do have additional evidence. Whether it's needed depends entirely on how this investigation is handled. We already know something here isn't right. If the response continues to be deflection — moving the topic instead of addressing the timing — then we'll have no choice but to let that evidence speak for itself, publicly and on the record. Call it a factcheck, not a threat: we'd much rather this be resolved fairly and internally, but we're not going to let the report be buried by turning it around on us.
A fair, evidence-based review of the transaction logs and timing is all we're asking for.
